This report provides a structured analysis of current This report examines how advisory services in organic agriculture are financed across Europe, with a particular focus on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) 2023–2027 and complementary funding sources. Rather than looking only at policy design, it highlights how financial support mechanisms are actually implemented and used in practice.

This report provides a structured analysis of current Strengthening advisory services is widely recognised as a key factor in achieving the European Union’s sustainability goals, including the target of reaching 25% organic farmland by 2030. Against this backdrop, the report analyses the CAP framework and identifies the most relevant instruments for advisory support, including knowledge transfer, cooperation schemes, and sector-specific measures.

The analysis across 13 Member States reveals a fragmented landscape. While advisory-related measures are commonly included in national Strategic Plans, their design, accessibility, and funding levels vary significantly. In many cases, complex administrative procedures and limited alignment with the specific needs of organic farming reduce their overall effectiveness.

A central finding is the continued reliance on CAP funding as the backbone of advisory financing in most countries, although alternative models exist. Additional funding streams — such as farmers’ associations, EU-funded projects, and private sector actors — play an important complementary role, helping to fill gaps and expand advisory capacity.

The report also highlights missed opportunities. Several CAP interventions designed to strengthen advisory services and collective structures remain underused or insufficiently implemented. At the same time, practical knowledge exchange formats — such as demonstration farms, regional learning groups, and locally adapted communication materials — are identified as particularly valuable for practitioners.

Overall, the report concludes that while the CAP provides substantial opportunities to support organic advisory services, these are not yet fully realised. Simplifying administrative procedures, improving the targeting of measures, and strengthening complementary funding approaches will be essential to enhance the effectiveness, reach, and long-term resilience of advisory systems in the organic sector.

How is advisory work funded in your context? Share key strengths, gaps, and ideas for better support of organic advisory services.

Join the discussion

Please note: Participation in the discussion requires a free registration on the OrganicAdviceNetwork.space platform.